Nicobar Group

China Energy Delivered

Nuclear News Weekly Roundup – 03/12 - 03/16

CNNC: We’ve been Thinking about Building a Regional Headquarter in Shanghai

“We’ve been thinking about building a regional headquarter in Shanghai,” CNNC President, Wang Shoujun, told journalists in a press conference during the “two sessions.” “Shanghai is the birthplace of Chinese nuclear power. The Shanghai municipality has made enormous contributions to the Qinshan NPP. Over the years, CNNC has been working closely with Shanghai Electric. In fact, CNNC’s development is not constrained to one place. Our headquarters and some R&D institutes are located in Beijing. Next, we are looking at Shanghai as an important place of support to develop and enhance the Chinese civil nuclear industry,” said Wang.


Qinshan and Sanmen Win Zhejiang Province’s Direct Power Sales Bid

The Development and Reform Commission of Zhejiang Province has recently released the “Notice about the Bidding Results of 2018 Direct Power Sales Pilot Platform.” According to the notice, Qinshan NPP and Sanmen NPP, two power generation enterprises with priority dispatch rights, both won direct power sales bids in Zhejiang Province. Qinshan won 10.475 billion KwH while Sanmen (still under construction) won 766 million KwH.


Fuqing Unit 5 Progress: Primary Pumps Reactor Internals Pass Acceptance Inspection; RCP Started Full Flow Test

On March 10th, Harbin Electric started to conduct a full flow test for Fuqing Unit 5’s RCP. The pump will be shipped to the site after the test.


On March 15th, the reactor internals of Fuqing Unit 5, the world’s first HPR1000, passed the acceptance inspection. The reactor internals were designed by the Nuclear Power Institute of China (NPIC) and manufactured by Shanghai Electric’s Shanghai No.1 Machine Tools Plant. Reactor internals include the primary equipment for all items inside a nuclear reactor. The system supports fuel bundles while absorbing neutrons and gamma ray emitted from the core, protecting the external materials from radiation, prolonging the lifespan of a reactor.


Fuqing Unit 6: Installation of Ring Crane’s Main Beam Started; Dome Will be Attached in Late March

On March 9th, the electric primary beam of the ring crane used at Fuqing Unit 6 was hoisted into place, paving the way for subsequent installation work. The ring crane is an important hoisting equipment used for installation, examination, and maintenance of devices.


CNPE GM Liu Wei said on March 13th that Fuqing Unit 6 is progressing smoothly. The current plan is to attach the containment dome after March 20th – sometime between 21st and 23rd, depending on the weather. Once the dome is topped off, Fuqing Unit 6 will enter the peak phase of installation.


Nuclear News Weekly Roundup – 03/05 - 03/09

NEA: 6-8 FCDs Planned This Year

The National Energy Administration released the 2018 Energy Work Guidance on March 7th, stating that it will continue to work on the issue of regional nuclear power curtailment. The guidance also indicates that efforts will be made to boost and support the progress of NPPs under construction. Sanmen Unit 1, Haiyang Unit 1, Taishan Unit 1, Tianwan Unit 3*, and Yangjiang Unit 5 are planned to be completed this year, which will add 6 MKW of new installed capacity. Approved NPP projects will also receive support and promotion, including 6-8 FCDs that are planned to go through this year.

Nicobar Notes: Tianwan Unit 3 has been connected to the grid since last December and began commercial operation in February 2018.


CNNC President Wang Shoujun: Appeal the NEA to Permit More New Builds

March 7th was the fifth day of the “two sessions,” the annual meetings of the national legislature and the top political advisory body. CNNC President Wang Shoujun told a journalist that “the Going Out of Hualong One is (only) truly realized in Pakistan. We exported three Hualong One units to Pakistan and two of them are under construction. We are having promising conversations with Argentina and Jordan and some other countries. We are being optimistic and hoping that we will sign contracts with these two countries this year... I appeal to the NEA to issue permits to new NPP projects.”


CNNC Increases Budget for Fuqing Unit 3 & 4

The original preliminary design budget for Fuqing Unit 3 & 4 was CNY 22.792 billion. Due to the post-Fukushima upgrades in safety standards, as well as the delay of equipment supply, the original allotted budget is proving to be inadequate to cover funds. The Electric Power Planning & Engineering Institute (EPPEI) was entrusted to evaluate the proposed changes to the original budget. The budget has been increased to CNY 24.31 billion.


Dongfang Electric Received Hinkley Point C’s Equipment Purchase Order

On March 1st, 2018, Dongfang Electric received equipment purchase orders for Hinkley Point C from Framatome and GE. Under those contracts, Dongfang Electric will provide steam generator supports, pressurizer supports, RCP supports, and the steam turbine generator’s LP outer casing. It marks a breakthrough for Dongfang Electric’s vision of Going Out; it is now fully capable of exporting equipment to high-end markets in developed countries.


Ling Long One, the CNNC Design of the SMR Demonstration Project, Passed Preliminary Design Inspection

CNNC announced that the Changjiang Small Modular Reactor (SMR) demonstration project that uses the self-developed Ling Long One (ACP100) reactor design has recently passed the preliminary design inspection. This signifies that CNNC has a firm grasp on Gen III small reactor design with complete proprietary intellectual property rights, which lays the foundation for future engineering application of SMRs.


China is Conducting Space Nuclear Power Studies

Liu Zhirang, Dean of China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation’s Academy of Aerospace Propulsion Technology, introduced during the “two sessions” that the Academy is working with other Chinese design and research institutes to conduct studies on space nuclear power projects and relevant key technologies, such as nuclear heating and nuclear power. These projects are intended to expand the scope of technologies used in future space missions.


Nuclear News Weekly Roundup – 02/25 - 03/04

CNNC Annual Performance Meeting: More Emphasis on Marine Nuclear Projects, Sanmen Unit 1 Grid Connection Pushed to Fall 2018

At a recently-held CNNC annual performance meeting, which also introduced targets for 2018, CNNC stated that its marine nuclear projects will receive more future support. Marine development is currently a part of national strategy planning, and China now has a firm grasp on marine nuclear technology. CNNC will start work on two related items: 1) a proposal to build nuclear powered icebreaker ships for arctic exploration purposes, and 2) a separate proposal to bolster nuclear power-based applications in coastal and island locations, such as those used for heating, gas, and water. In response to Sanmen Unit 1’s progress, CNNC said that the Chinese government is being extremely cautious with the decision to allow fuel-loading as it is the world’s first AP1000 unit. Sanmen Unit 1 is expected to undergo many more rounds of testing and experimentation after the fuel load. Grid connection is projected to be accomplished by fall 2018 or in early 2019. 


SPIC Approved to Compile the New IEC 63186 Standards on NPP Seismic Outage System Design

Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research and Design Institute (SNERDI), the R&D subsidiary of SPIC, was recently approved to compile the new International Electrotechnical Commission’s 63186 NPP Standards – Important Safety Instrumentation and Control Systems – Seismic Outage System Design Recommendations. Contributing to the international standards of the ISO and IEC is a significant breakthrough for the Chinese nuclear industry. It also marks the Chinese nuclear industry’s switch from being a mere follower in this field to becoming a leader.


Jiangsu ENTC Nuclear Technology Won the Bid to Supply Taishan Unit 2’s NI Mechanical Seal Materials

Jiangsu ENTC Nuclear Technology announced recently that it won both first and second section project bids to supply mechanical seal materials for the nuclear island (NI) of Taishan Unit 2. The contract is with Taishan Nuclear Power Joint Venture Company, Taishan NPP’s operation and management (O&M) company co-invested by CGN, EDF, and Guangdong YUDEAN Group. This was also the first bid of its type (large displacement piping for the biological shield) to be fully localized, signaling the end of only foreign companies dominating this area of the market.


Hongyanhe NPP’s Active Radiation Monitoring System Passes NNSA Inspection

On February 26th, the Northeast Nuclear and Radiation Inspection Station of the Ministry of Environmental Protection (MEP) held an examination conference for Hongyanhe NPP’s active radiation monitoring system on behalf of the NNSA. The inspection group conducted a comprehensive examination by reviewing documents, holding site surveys, reviewing items monitored, and interviewing NPP staff. The conference concluded with the active radiation monitoring system passing the inspection and receiving the greenlight to begin operation.


Fuqing Unit 5 & 6 Had a Successful First Backfeeding

On March 2nd, CNNC’s HPR1000 demonstration project, Fuqing Unit 5 & 6 underwent a successful first-time 220 kV backfeeding. This has set the stage for subsequent installation and commissioning work. Power backfeeding is usually needed during the later stages of power station construction when consuming large amounts of power prior to power generation.

Nuclear News Weekly Roundup – February 2018

Construction of the Fuel Building’s Main Structure at Fuqing Unit 5 is Completed

On the early morning of February 12th, Fuqing Unit 5’s 36.5m panel at the fuel building underwent its final concrete pour, marking the completion of the hall’s main structure. The fuel building is the area where fuel rods are loaded and unloaded, and where the fuel storage system is operated. The building is a rectangular plant to the south of the containment building, which it is attached to. The hall has many internal structures, including the refueling pool, spent fuel pool cooling and processing systems, and service water system.


Construction of the Containment Building Internal Structure at Fuqing Unit 6 is Completed

On February 11th, the last concrete panel of the primary equipment compartments above the 16.5 m platform at Fuqing Unit 6 was poured, marking the completion of the containment building internal structure. The compartments, which are used to protect major components within the containment building, will eventually contain a pressurizer, water tanks for the external reactor vessel cooling (ERVC) system, as well as evaporators. The completion of the structure paves the way for the introduction and installation of the equipment mentioned above.


Sluice Gate Components Shipped for Karachi Unit 2 (K2), the First HPR1000 Outside China

On February 6th, the sluice gate frames for K2 were shipped from China Nuclear Industry Fifth Construction Company (CNEC5), a subsidiary of China Nuclear Engineering & Construction Group Corporation (CNEC) that recently merged with CNNC. The frames are the first set of components of K2’s sluice gate project. It is also the first time CNEC5 was contracted for an NPP sluice gate project.


Inspection Conference for the Preliminary Design of Changjiang Small Modular Reactor (SMR) Demonstration Project Held in Beijing

The inspection conference for the preliminary design of the Changjiang SMR demonstration project was held in Beijing from February 8th to 10th. The examination report finds that the preliminary design in in compliance with all safety regulations, rules, guidance, and standards. Comments and suggestions on corrective actions and further work were also provided. The Changjiang SMR demonstration project, which has already obtained permission from the National Development & Reform Commission (NDRC), is a first-of-its-kind project in China. It uses the CNNC ACP100 design, also known as the “Ling Long One” design.


IAEA Technical Cooperation (TC) Programme’s Fourth International Experts Meeting Held in Beijing

The IAEA’s 2016-2017 Technical Cooperation (TC) Programme’s Fourth Experts Meeting was held at the China Institute of Atomic Energy (CIAE) in Beijing from January 29th to February 2nd. Experts from ROSATOM’s Pilot and Demonstration Center for Decommissioning of Uranium-Graphite Nuclear Reactors (PDC UGR), the Romanian National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering (IFIN-HH), the Ignalina NPP in Lithuania, CIAE’s decommissioning related departments, and the IAEA program officer met to discuss two topics: 1) the dismounting, packaging, and storage of radioactive graphite; and 2) NPP decommissioning and demolition technology.

Nuclear News Weekly Roundup – 02/11 - 02/16

CGN Power Plans on Listing on Shenzhen Stock Exchange

CGN Power Ltd, a CGN Group subsidiary currently listed on Hong Kong stock exchange, announced on February 11th that it plans to raise up to $794 million from a domestic listing on the Shenzhen stock exchange. CGN Power will offer up to 5.05 billion shares at 1 yuan per share, an equivalent of 10% of the company’s total shares. The proposal has received approval from the company’s board but is still awaiting approval from shareholders and regulatory authorities. CGN Power said the money raised will be used for the construction of Yangjiang Units 5 & 6, as well as Fangchenggang Units 3 & 4. Payback periods are usually drawn-out for projects like NPP construction, which also requires a very high upfront investment. CGN needs the funds to increase its liquidity.


Premier Li Keqiang Met with Westinghouse VP William Poirier

Premier Li Keqiang met with foreign experts in Beijing before the Chinese Lunar New Year. William Poirier, Westinghouse’s Vice President for China Projects, was invited among 60 other attendees. While stressing that China needs to continue to open its doors to the outside world to introduce foreign expertise and technology, Li listened to the experts’ discussion about their current business in China. Poirier gave a talk about the future role of nuclear power in China.


Chinese Power Industry SOEs will Further Ownership Reform

As the 2018 new year working conferences took place for Chinese power industry SOEs, some have listed furthering ownership reforms and restructuring as one of their goals. SPIC will initiate a pilot program based on a mixed ownership reform through asset securitization and debt-to-equity swaps. Huaneng also said that it will further reform via diversification of its stock ownership. A representative of the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC) Peng Huagang revealed earlier that marketization of SOE operations will be carried out in a broader sense through various mechanisms, with one example being the introduction of private capital to SOE ownership.

Nuclear News Weekly Roundup – 02/05 - 02/09

CGN is Authorized to Develop China’s First Nuclear Power Heating Project

In a recent symposium on nuclear heating in Northern China, NNSA issued its approval for CGN together with Tsinghua University to develop China’s first nuclear heating project. The two parties will begin a series of preliminary works, including site selection, land use, water supply, emergency response, public communications, etc. There have been many cases of nuclear heating projects around the world and China has ample preparatory work on related research and studies. A low-temperature heating reactor is a product of integrated design with high safety. It has great potential market demand and can be applied in various fields. For example, it can be used in power supply, heating, water and gas supply to provide heating for communities and industrial parks, as well as comprehensive power supply in remote areas.


CNNC: Merge with CNECC will Complete Our Industry Value Chain, will Accelerate the Pace of “Going Out”

China National Nuclear Company (CNNC) held a press conference on February 9th where the spokesperson Mr. Pan Jianming responded to the interests and concerns over CNNC’s merger with China Nuclear Energy Construction Company (CNEC). On January 31st, SASAC announced that CNNC will be absorbing CNEC (without compensation) and CNEC will no longer listed as an independent SOE supervised by SASAC. CNEC was the world’s only enterprise with a continuous three-decade record of focusing on NPP construction. It is capable of building forty nuclear units at the same time. For its part CNNC has comprehensive nuclear technology capabilities. The merger allows CNNC to complete a full value chain in the nuclear industry. The merger helps to integrate the resources of both sides and will accelerate the pace of exporting nuclear technology. Mr. Pan also delivered an update on situation of the four HPR1000 sthat CNNC is building in China and Pakistan: all the units are under construction on schedule and are currently in the installation phase. He also reviewed CNNC’s work in the international market last year, including the contracts to build a HWR and a HPR1000 in Argentina, the agreement to cooperate with Saudi Arabia on Thorium resources and the establishment of the Global Innovation Nuclear Energy Technology Company which is a joint venture with TerraPower to develop the Gen IV Traveling Wave Reactor (TWR).


Nuclear News Weekly Roundup – 01/29 - 02/02

Tianwan Unit 3 is now Operating at Full-power

On January 30th, 2018 Tianwan Unit 3 had its power output increased to 100%, thereby achieving full-power operation. Tianwan 3 was connected to the grid on December 30th, 2017, and was last year’s first and only grid connection achieved by an under-construction NPP in China.


Hinkley Point C Project Progressing Well

The Hinkley Point C project, China’s largest energy investment focus in Europe, has been steadily progressing forward. Since the signing of the contract project between EDF, CGN, and the British government, fifteen Chinese companies have already passed the project qualification inspection, 7 of which are sub-contractors. The project itself is progressing well, and of note, CGN has invested GBP 1.8 million to date. The project site has an area the size of 245 soccer pitches, and is currently the largest construction site in Europe. Meanwhile, the Sizewell C and the Bradwell B projects are in the early preparation stage with geological studies being carried out at the Bradwell B site. In addition, the Generic Design Assessment (GDA) process that was initiated for the HPR1000 design in January 2017 is now in its second phase. It is expected that the HPR1000 will enter phase III of the GDA process at the end of this year.


The World’s First HPR1000 RPV Installed at Fuqing Unit 5

Fuqing Unit 5’s RPV was successfully installed on January 28th. This component is the first RPV that China maintains proprietary intellectual rights over. The successful installation paves a clear road for subsequent installation work.


Sanmen Unit 2 Finished Hot Testing

On January 31st, the AP1000 at Sanmen Unit 2 finished hot testing and entered the preparation phase prior to fuel-loading. The hot testing period lasted for 77 days and included various evaluations such as a reactor coolant system dynamics and vibration effects assessment, an RCP hot performance assessment, a passive automatic depressurization system reliability assessment, and others. The effectiveness of Sanmen Unit 2’s primary systems, safety systems, and auxiliary systems was fully verified during the hot testing period.

Nuclear News Weekly Roundup – 01/22 - 01/26

A New Domestic First! Construction Begins for CNNC’s Indigenously Developed NPP “Central Nervous System” Simulator

The nuclear safety grade digital control system used by nuclear reactors is akin to the “central nervous system” of a nuclear power plant. The Nuclear Power Institute of China (NPIC), a subsidiary of the China National Nuclear Company (CNNC),  recently developed China’s first indigenous military/civil nuclear reactor DCS platform simulator, which has now successfully begun construction following approval from the National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA). This is yet another achievement for CNNC, which was realized through persistent innovation and a strategy centered around joint military/civil development. This signifies that China’s civil nuclear reactor safety grade DCS has made a transitional leap from the design stage to the production stage.

First HPR1000's Conventional Island TG Stator Lowered into Position

At 2:58pm on January 19th, the CI’s heaviest component, the turbine generator stator, was successfully lowered into position at the Fuqing Unit 5 HPR1000 demonstration plant, setting the foundation for the subsequent turbine generator installation. Lifted by a 466.5-ton single-hook crane, the stators for Fuqing Unit 5’s TGs weigh in at 455 tons, making it the heaviest component at the site.

The World’s First HPR1000 RPV Now in Place!

At 5:07pm on January 28th, the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) for Fuqing Unit 5 was successfully hoisted into place. After the positioning of the RPV, other components may be installed, like the RPV nozzle insulation, paving the way for welding of the primary piping.

The RPV is the core element of the nuclear reactor, serving an important safety shielding purpose. The RPV allows the nuclear reactor to sustain chain reaction under a controllable loading of heat and pressure. Compared with its Gen II counterparts, the HPR1000 RPV is more advanced in terms of design, material production, welding, and final machining, not to mention its heightened manufacturing standards.

The RPV was developed and designed by Nuclear Power Institute of China (NPIC), with China First Heavy Industries (CFHI) tasked with the manufacture.

The installation work was streamed live by CCTV (China Central Television).

Strategic Insights Inc. and Nicobar Group Team Up in Strategic Partnership Agreement, Allowing Customers to Expand their Reach into China, the U.S. and Canada

TORONTO, SHANGHAI (January 29, 2018) – North American-based Strategic Insights Inc. and China-based Nicobar Group Ltd. today announced an exclusive partnership agreement. The availability of integrated business development services will allow customers to benefit from streamlined approaches for lead generation and market intelligence in the nuclear energy market in all three countries.

The partnership is a strong strategic fit, leveraging the two leading companies’ respective strengths, across three main areas:

• First, Strategic Insights and Nicobar have both developed processes to enhance and expedite the expansion of sales of products and services in the nuclear sector. Strategic Insights Inc. will take the lead in using these methodologies to serve customers in the U.S., Canada and the U.K. and Nicobar will take the lead in serving customers in China and other Asian countries.

• Second, both companies plan to use their combined resources to provide a “one-stop shop” for companies looking to have a strategically aligned business development approach across countries with some of the fastest growing nuclear energy needs.

• Finally, Strategic Insights. and Nicobar have published highly regarded reports in the nuclear industry in their jurisdictions, including reports on country developments, advanced and small modular reactors, life extensions and waste management. The partnership allows customers to benefit from enhanced access to these and future market intelligence products.

“Today’s announcement is another solid step towards our mission of providing actionable market intelligence and business development support to every decision-maker in the nuclear energy industry,” said Strategic Insights CEO T. Rosemary Yeremian. “China is a vibrant and important market that our customers in North America are looking to expand into with the help of Nicobar.”

“We’re very pleased and fortunate to have found a partner with whom we have such strong and natural synergies” said Nicobar Group Director James Stovall. “We’re looking forward to working with Strategic Insights to establish a robust model for commercial cooperation between the Chinese and North American nuclear industries, and exploring new opportunities in developing nuclear sectors around the world.”

To learn more about how the partnership of Strategic Insights Inc. and Nicobar Group can assist in the nuclear sector, companies are invited to visit our websites: or

About Strategic Insights Inc.

Strategic Insights Inc. is a market intelligence and advisory firm that specializes in the nuclear energy and electricity sectors. Strategic Insights offers a full complement of research and advisory services and also publishes a suite of market outlooks and forecasts.


Rosemary Yeremian
Strategic Insights Inc.
Phone: 1-647-881-7488

About Nicobar Group Ltd.

Nicobar Group is a niche business consultancy specializing in the China nuclear power market. Headquartered in Shanghai, Nicobar’s services includes China market intelligence, market entry support, strategy development, project management, China lead generation and China supply chain and sourcing for the nuclear industry.


James Stovall
Nicobar Group Ltd.
Phone: +86 155 0216 4855

Nuclear News Weekly Roundup – 01/15 - 01/19

Multiple Key Components Installed at Fuqing Unit 5

On January 15th, following the introduction of each of Fuqing Unit 5’s three steam generators, each of the three RCP cases were also hoisted into position. The first two RCP cases were put into place on December 10th, 2017, and January 14th, 2018 respectively, with the following installed on the 15th. On the afternoon of January 19th, the conventional island (CI) turbine generator stator was installed. The stator is the heaviest component within the CI hall and one of the key components of the turbine generator. The stator was manufactured by Dongfang Electric Machinery Company.


“Nuclear Power Equipment On-line Monitoring and Intelligent Diagnosis Laboratory” Established at SNPI

The unveiling ceremony of the “Nuclear Power Equipment On-line Monitoring and Intelligent Diagnosis Laboratory” was held at Suzhou Nuclear Power Institute (SNPI) on January 12th. The lab is affiliated with the Ministry of Science and Technology’s State Nuclear Power Plant Safety and Security Engineering Technology Research Center at SNPI. Ningde NPP, Harbin Engineering University, and North China Electric Power University are all co-founders of the lab. The lab will run new algorithms using big data derived from operational NPPS to provide intelligent monitoring services for fleet units. Following the unveiling ceremony, Unit 1 of Ling’ao phase II and Ningde Unit 1 will become the pilot units used to build intelligent monitoring models.


Nuclear News Weekly Roundup – 01/08 - 01/12

Xi and Macron Attend the Nameplate Unveiling Ceremony for Taishan Unit 1, the World’s First EPR Unit

On the afternoon of January 9th, 2018, Chinese President Xi Jinping and French President Emmanuel Macron unveiled the nameplate of Taishan Unit 1, as the world’s first EPR (European Pressurized Reactor), at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing. Taishan Unit 1 began construction in 2009 and Unit 2 poured its “first concrete” in 2010. They were, at the time, the third and fourth EPR units to begin construction in the world. Taishan NPP is constructed and operated by Taishan Nuclear Power Joint Venture Company Limited (TNPC), a joint venture owned by CGN, EDF, and Guangdong Yudean Group. It is the largest Sino-French energy cooperation project.


All Three Steam Generators in Place at Fuqing HPR1000 Unit

On January 7th, the third steam generator of Fuqing Unit 5 was successfully topped off. With the completion of the installation, all three HPR1000 demonstration project’s steam generators are now in place. The third steam generator was introduced onto the NI’s 16.5 m platform on December 28th, 2017, and was prepared for installation during the ten days following. The installation began at 8:00 am, January 7th, 2018. The steam generator was then turned and placed upright, had its clasp buckles removed, accessories installed, and was finally topped off on the vertical stands.


Fangchenggang Unit 3’s Personnel Airlock Shipped to Site

The first personnel airlock module of CGN’s HRP1000 demonstration project was shipped from Dalian Baoyuan Nuclear Equipment Co., Ltd. on January 5th. It lays a solid foundation for subsequent installation of the containment dome. The personnel airlock will be placed on the platform, which is elevated +1.20m, inside the containment building. It allows passage of personnel and small equipment without breaking the seal of the containment building during plant operation or hot shutdown.


Qinshan NPP’s First Outage in 2018 Completed

Fangjiashan Unit 2 successfully resumed grid connection at 2:18 pm on January 4th, marking the completion of its third refueling outage. The outage, which began in 2017, was Qinshan’s seventh outage, and the first of this year. The outage lasted for 33.9 days after the unit was taken off-line from the eastern China power grid on December 1st, 2017, and was finished 4.1 days ahead of the original schedule.


Nuclear News Weekly Roundup – 01/01 - 01/05

Prestress Platform of World’s First HPR1000 Delivered to Fuqing NPP

The prestress platform for Fuqing Unit 5 was delivered on January 2nd. It paves the way for subsequent work such as installation and commissioning. The prestress engineering needs to meet the functional requirements for the tendons, tensioning and grouting. The engineers must also manage their work within the limited space inside the containment shell, and complete the complex tasks while avoiding contact with the other equipment already installed. The prestress platform is the most optimized of its type within China’s nuclear industry in terms of size, extent of integration, and convenience of engineering operations. It increases the efficiency of the prestress engineering operations and lowers its impact on other ongoing engineering operations.


Manufacturing of Xudapu Phase I’s Mechanical Modules Begins

The opening ceremony for Xudapu NPP Phase I’s mechanical module manufacturing project was recently held within the 1st Work Division of Dalian Shipbuilding Industry Company (DSIC, a subsidiary of China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation). This is the first nuclear safety-grade equipment manufacturing project awarded to DSIC after receiving its HAF 601 nuclear safety certification. The project will result in 90 mechanical modules to be used at Xudapu Units 1&2, which are built by China Nuclear Power Engineering Company (CNPE). There are 14 nuclear safety-grade modules, including one nuclear Safety-Class 1 component. Some of the primary components include structural frames, piping, cable conduits, air ducts, valves, pressure vessels, etc., weighing a total of approximately 900 tons. The largest module, designated as “Q601” (a safety-class 1 module), has a size of 4709 X 5137 X 9763 mm and weighs 55 tons by itself.


Tianwan Unit 3 Successfully Connected to the Grid

On December 30th, 2017, the generator circuit breaker for Tianwan Unit 3 was officially switched on, marking the unit’s first successful connection to the grid. This is the ninth time CNPE has served as an EPC contractor for an NPP that has been fully built and connected to the grid. Tianwan Unit 3 uses Russian VVER 1000 / 428 PWR technology, which was permitted as China’s “NPP icebreaker” after the Fukushima accident. The reactor design was contracted to Atomstroyexport, Russia’s nuclear power equipment and service exporter. CNPE served as the CI and BOP designer and EPC contractor, while CNNC’s Jiangsu Nuclear Power Company performed the commissioning work.


China’s First Gen IV Fast Reactor Quietly Pours First Concrete – First and Only FCD of 2017

On December 29th, CNNC published the news on its company website that its sodium-cooled fast reactor pilot project in Xiapu, Fujian Province, began construction earlier that day. It was the only nuclear project initiated in 2017, as well as the first since 2015. According to CNNC, the fast reactor project is a key part of China’s “Three-step Strategy” for nuclear power development, which includes constructing thermal neutron reactors, fast breeder reactors, and finally controlled fission reactors.


Nuclear News Weekly Roundup – 12/11 - 12/15

The Bradwell B Project Begins Geological Survey for NPP Site

On December 11th, the Bradwell B (BRB) project, where China’s HPR1000 export in Britain will be built, began its geological survey for the NPP site. It is the first on-site “ground work” of the project and an important step toward formal construction. According to Mr. Zhen Dongshan, General Manager of CGN’s project companies in Britain, primary work at this stage is to obtain field data for seismic analysis, including measurements of seismic refraction, microseism, seismic reflection, resistivity, etc. The BRB site is located on the Essex coast near London and is close to the Bradwell A NPP which is under decommissioning.


Key Installation Milestones Reached for HPR1000s at Fuqing NPP

First commissioning task for Fuqing Unit 5 was completed on the afternoon of December 12th. It marks that Fuqing Unit 5 is now at the stage of comprehensive commissioning. The first commissioning is the “TP7LBO12 direct current switchboard logic simulation test,” simulating various fault scenarios to verify their respective alarm signals. Engineers from CNNC’s China Nuclear Power Engineering Corporation (CNPEC) conducted the commissioning.

As of mid-December, the HPR1000s at Fuqing NPP have progressed smoothly. Fuqing Unit 5 accomplished successful installation of the first RCP’s pump shell, and Fuqing Unit 6 has completed civil construction on the reactor building internal silo.


New Development on the Sanming NPP in Fujian Province

On December 8th, Wang Chaoteng, Vice GM of Sanming Nuclear Power Co., Ltd, and Xiao Yuqin, Deputy County Mayor of Jiangle Country, signed the Strategic Cooperation Framework between Sanming Nuclear Power Company and Jaingle County Government together. The framework states that both sides will promote the Sanming NPP project as well as the economic development in Jiangle County; they will also commit to environmental protection, NPP site protection, public education campaign, and information exchange with local residents.


2018 Shanghai Direct Electricity Sales Plan Released, 1 Billion kWh Quota for Nuclear Power

Last Thursday (December 14th), the Shanghai Development and Reform Commission, the Shanghai Municipal Commission of Economy and Informatization, and East China Energy Regulatory Bureau of National Energy Administration jointly released the 2018 Direct Electricity Sales Work Plan for Electricity Customers and Power Generation Enterprises in Shanghai. The plan estimates that approximately 15-billion kWh’s amount of power will be sold in Shanghai’s direct electricity sales market next year. Nuclear Power Qinshan Joint Operation Company and Qinshan Third Nuclear Power Company, Qinshan Phase II & III’s operator and owners, will have a quota of 1-billion kWh’s amount of power in the electricity market. Nuclear power is still a small share of the market comparing to the 15-billion kWh amount designated to China Yangzi Power, a subsidiary of China Three Gorges Corporation and a hydropower utility. The primary trading mechanisms include annual bilateral negotiation, annual listed trading, and annual centralized auction. Mid-term or short-term trades will also be performed based on real-time market demand.


Nuclear News Weekly Roundup – 12/04 - 12/08

No. 1 Steam Generator of the World’s First HPR1000 Installed at Fuqing Unit 5

On November 28th, the first steam generator (ZH-65) was successfully installed at Fuqing Unit 5. The steam generator is indigenously designed and developed by Nuclear Power Institute of China (NPIC). The successful installation hits a new milestone for primary equipment installation and paves the way for subsequent work.


China’s First Gen III NPP May Begin Commercial Operation Next Year

State Power Investment Corporation (SPIC) had its first Open House day last week in Beijing. The corporation in charge of the AP1000 technical transfer said that Sanmen Unit 1, China’s first Gen III NPP, is in the final pre-fueling preparation stage and will hopefully begin commercial operation next year. As of the end of this month, China has 56 nuclear power units in total, 37 of which are in operation. Among the 19 units under construction, there are four AP1000s. The indigenously developed CAP1400 demonstration project is also in the works. The CAP1400 project is one of the 16 National Science and Technology Major Projects. A single CAP1400 unit can generate 11.4 billion kWh worth of power annually, while the NPP and its primary equipment have a designated service life of 60 years. The CAP1400 is much safer than older generation nuclear technologies. The passive safety design assures a 72-hour non-interference safe period following a power outage.


CGN Looks to Opt Out of Direct Electricity Sales Market in Guangdong Next Year

The Government of Guangdong Province announced in August that nuclear power will take part in electricity sales through market-based mechanisms in 2018. China General Nuclear, China’s nuclear power magnet and the owner of all NPPs in Guangdong Province, said this month that it would rather not immediately participate in the newly reformed market. CGN is proposing an alternative plan instead by which it will surrender a portion of profit to the government in return for guaranteed fixed price & volume of grid-connection power. Experts comment that it is a reasonable move for CGN to act in such a conservative manner. However, Guangdong has great electricity demand, and the market mechanism there is relatively transparent and well enforced. Therefore, CGN could totally figure out a profitable price in the market given its negotiating power in the province of its base camp. At this point, the proposed plan is negotiated by concerned parties and it is unclear whether it will be accepted or not.

Nuclear News Weekly Roundup – 11/27 - 12/01

Key Installation Milestones Reached for China’s HPR1000 Builds

On November 28th, the steam generator of Fuqing Unit 5, the world’s first HPR1000, was lowered into the equipment room. After being maneuvered through the 16.5m2 gantry platform on November 10th, it was unpacked and equipped with lifting components. It was fully lifted and ready to be installed after 18 days of preparation. As a primary equipment of the NI, the steam generator having completed the preparation work for installation is a significant developmental marker of the project. It also paves the way for subsequent work, like welding of the primary pipes.

For China’s international HPR1000 build in Pakistan, a welding machine officially went to work at Karachi Unit 2’s NI plant hall on November 23rd local time. It took 53 minutes and 56 seconds to finish the backing weld, marking the beginning of the primary pipe welding of China’s first HPR1000 export, at Karachi. The K-2 project is built by China Nuclear Industry Fifth Construction Co., Ltd, a subsidiary of CNNC. K-2 is also the first among all the HPR1000 projects under construction around the globe to start primary pipe welding.


China’s First Nuclear Generator Renovation Design Passed Assessment Inspection

Shanghai Electric has recently organized an assessment and inspection conference for the renovation design of the No.1 generator at Qinshan Unit 1. The expert panel comments that “the renovation design and update plan will realize the purpose of capacity increase and life extension. The renovated generator will perform well, have a reliable structure, and allow for convenient operation and maintenance. The design surpasses requirements and standards in both domestic and international markets.” Qinshan NPP is the first nuclear plant in China that was indigenously designed, developed, constructed, and operated. The main generator is a 310MW double inner water-cooled turbo-generator produced by Shanghai Electric Machine Corporation, which was originally designed for 30 years’ usage. It has been operated smoothly and steadily for over 25 years since the NPP was connected to the grid on December 15th, 1991.


First Marine Nuclear Power Platform Will Start Construction Soon

The 2017 Annual Conference of Hubei Province’s Shipping and Marine Engineering Equipment Academician Work Center was held in Wuhan on November 26th. It was announced during the meeting that the marine nuclear power platform, a part of the shipping and marine engineering equipment major project within Hubei Province’s “Thirteenth Five-year Plan,” is about to start construction following the imminent completion of its design work. The first platform is expected to begin operations prior to 2020. A marine nuclear power platform is a small NPP on the sea, which could either be floating or submersible. It will power off-shore oil-drilling platforms as well as facilities on islands and reefs, and become an important part of China’s territorial water infrastructure.


Test of First DN450 Explosion Valve for CAP1400 A Success

The DN450 explosion valve, which will be used in the CAP1400 demonstration unit, passed the hot opening testing on November 22nd. It marks the CAP explosion valve series has passed inspection, and signifies that the indigenous development and manufacture work was successful. The explosion valve testing was run at SPIC’s Central Research Institute. The prototype was jointly developed and manufactured by Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research and Design Institute, Dalian DV Valve Corporation, and Haitian Group in Sichuan.


CNNC Released “Yanlong,” a Self-developed Low Temperature Heating Reactor

Concluding on November 28th, a pool-style light-water reactor – part of the demonstration heating reactor project – was safely operated for 168 hours, and successfully provided heating for the China Institute of Atomic Energy complex, comprising a total area of about 10000 m2. CNNC released Yanlong, the self-developed pool-style low temperature heating reactor, in Beijing on the same day. Yanlong also has the codename of “DHR-400” because it is a 400MW district heating reactor. According to CNNC, a 400MW Yanlong reactor is able to heat up an area of 20 million square meters, an equivalent of two hundred thousand 3-bedroom apartments.


University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Establishes New School of Nuclear Science &Technology

Approved by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS) is establishing a new School of Nuclear Science and Technology for both teaching and research purposes. The school building is led by a joint force of CAS’ Institute of Modern Physics (Lanzhou), Institute of High Energy Physics (Beijing), Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, and Institute of Theoretical Physics (Beijing). The unveiling ceremony of the new school was held at UCAS on November 29th in Beijing.

Nuclear News Weekly Roundup – 11/20 - 11/24

Contract Signed for Third HPR1000 Export

On November 21st, the contract for Chashma Unit 5 (aka the C-5 project) was signed between Wang Shoujun, chairman of China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC), and Muhammad Naeem, chairman of Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission (PAEC). The contract specifies that CNNC will build an HPR1000 unit with a capacity of at least 1 GWe for Chashma NPP. It will be the third HPR1000 to be exported, following the two units currently under construction in Karachi (K2 and K3). Chashma Unit 5 will be the seventh reactor unit that China exports to Pakistan.


Haiyang Unit 2’s RCPs Installation Complete, Jogged Successfully

The four RCPs of Haiyang Unit 2, the AP1000 project, were successfully jogged for the first time on November 18th. At this point, all of the RCPs of the two AP1000 projects at Sanmen and Haiyang are ready to operate. Completion of this step lays the foundation for the next steps in the commissioning process: cold hydraulic testing and hot functional testing of the primary coolant system.


‘Heart’ of Fuqing Unit 5’s CI Completed

The operating floor of the turbine foundation block for Fuqing Unit 5, the world’s first HPR1000 reactor, was completed on November 17th. It took China Nuclear Industry 24th Construction Company, a subsidiary of China Nuclear Engineering & Construction Corporation (CNEC), nearly 33 hours to pour a total volume of 2400 m3 concrete. This was the next major milestone of this FOAK unit following the topping-off of the reactor dome itself, and the most important concrete-pouring milestone since the first concrete was poured for the CI plant hall. It paves the way for the subsequent installation of key equipment including stators, condensers, and the steam generator turbine.


Sanmen HTGR Project’s Pre-feasibility Study Report Passed Milestone Inspection

Under contract by the CNEC High Temperature Reactor Holdings Corporation (CNECHTR), China’s domestic Electric Power Planning & Engineering Institute (EPPEI) organized an inspection meeting for the pre-feasibility study report of CNEC’s Sanmen high temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) project. The meeting was held in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, from November 16th to 17th. The pre-feasibility report passed this inspection, hitting an important milestone for the commercialization and development of building HTGR projects on (conventional) thermal power plant sites. It is a revolutionary idea and brand-new low-carbon strategy to replace thermal power plants with HTGRs. The replacement will benefit the economy in multiple ways, including value appreciation of state-owned assets and better utilization of (conventional) thermal power plants. It will also serve political purposes, for example, mitigating the conflicts for local governments to balance between environmental protection and emissions reductions on the one hand, and economic development and social stability on the other hand.

Nuclear News Weekly Roundup – 11/13 - 11/17

Phase II of the Generic Design Assessment for Bradwell B HPR1000 Project has Entered Phase II

On the morning of November 16th local time, CGN and its local partner, EDF, released a joint announcement that the UK Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) and Environment Agency (EA) have given approval for the Bradwell B HPR1000 project to proceed onto phase II of the Generic Design Assessment (GDA).


Fangchenggang Unit 3 CI Turbine Building Raft Foundation Concrete Pouring Complete

On November 12th, CGN’s HPR1000 demonstration project at Fangchenggang reached another milestone. Unit 3’s CI finished pouring concrete for the raft foundation of its turbine foundation. It has laid the groundwork for further civil construction tasks.


Steam Generator of World’s First FPR1000 Delivered, Marking the Start of Primary Equipment Installation

On November 10th, first steam generator of Fuqing Unit 5, the world’s first HPR1000 and CNNC’s demonstration project, was successfully introduced into containment through the 16.5 m2 gantry platform. The ZH-65 steam generator used in Fuqing Unit 5 was designed and developed by CNNC and is one key piece of equipment in the reactor primary coolant (RPC) system, transforming heat from the reactor core into steam, which in turn generates power. As the crux between the primary and secondary coolant loops, steam generators act as the ‘lungs’ of the reactor. This successful milestone marks the start of primary equipment installation for Fuqing Unit 5.


Views Not Our Own - An Analysis on The Outlook of Westinghouse's Impending Bankruptcy and Suggestions for the Chinese Nuclear Industry Response

Nicobar note: In the "Views Not Our Own" series, we publish translated opinion pieces and analyses from thought leaders and influential figures in the Chinese nuclear sphere to allow watchers of China nuclear to gain greater insight into attitudes and sentiments within the  market. The views and perspectives within this translated essay are solely those of the author and do not represent Nicobar Group.

This article was originally published in a combination op-ed + Q&A format with the writer and most topics were addressed far more candidly than you usually see from anyone highly placed inside the Chinese nuclear industry. This is likely a direct reflection of the fact that the writer, Mr. Wen Hongjun, has been retired for nearly a decade and doesn’t have to use the same tactful language you’d expect from current industry players. In our translation, we’ve done our best to translate his sentiment and positions accurately, including portions that came across as more emotional or filled with nationalist sentiment, of which there are many. Mr. Wen’s opinions should not be taken as representative of Chinese industry sentiment as a whole, but rather one perspective from one extreme side of the spectrum. 

An Analysis on the Outlook of Westinghouse’s Impending Bankruptcy, and Suggestions for the Chinese Nuclear Industry Policy Response

Author: Wen Hongjun
Publish Date: October 31, 2017

Translation begins below:

The impending bankruptcy of Westinghouse, a company widely viewed as the “grandfather” of nuclear power development, came as a shock to the worldwide nuclear power community this year.

Westinghouse’s rapid decline and descent into bankruptcy territory

 1.       The AP1000 project is quickly losing steam, marking the decline of Westinghouse

On March 29th, Westinghouse submitted a bankruptcy protection application to the American bankruptcy court. [Following this] The owners of the two American AP1000 nuclear builds in progress, V.C. Summer and Vogtle, announced on July 31st and August 31st, respectively, that they had submitted [construction] continuation proposals to the Georgia Public Services Commission (PSC).

Of the four AP1000 project construction permits [recently] issued by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, two [were issued to] V.C. Summer and Vogtle, which are currently under construction, and two additional permits were issued for Lee in South Carolina, and Levy in Florida.

 In just one month, Westinghouse has lost nine units belonging to four projects; two units with the termination of V.C. Summer, the four planned units between Lee and Levy, and 3 units with the “loss” of Moorside. This upheaval is the symbol of both Westinghouse’s wax and wane on the whole, as well as its accelerated decline.

Westinghouse was able to achieve this “wax” with the help of China and its decision to procure of 3rd generation technology, but suffered a series of defeats in the international market, pulling each of its partners into “economic crisis” with each foray. In the end, Westinghouse itself also fell into the “mud pit” that is [its current situation].

According to American bankruptcy law, companies must propose a restructuring program as well as a debt repayment plan approved by both the creditors and the bankruptcy court to receive bankruptcy protection, otherwise the only alternative is “bankruptcy liquidation” [with no recovery option]. The termination of the V.C. Summer build has only served to hasten Westinghouse’s path to bankruptcy. Earning the creditor’s approval of the restructuring program and debt repayment plan is only the first juncture in Westinghouse’s uncertain attempt at survival. The second juncture will be to see whether or not the company, post-restructuring, will be able to sell itself to a new buyer.

2.       Westinghouse: From Resurgence to Decline

China supported and helped realize this resurgence. In 2005, BNFL, then Westinghouse’s parent company, decided to sell Westinghouse. Under BNFL’s control, Westinghouse had underperformed, leading to the decision to have it auctioned. At the time China was inviting tenders for third generation nuclear technology and Westinghouse’s AP1000 was the preferred model. It won the tender, and Westinghouse’s value skyrocketed, sending it down the road to resurgence. Within just a short period of time, Westinghouse’s AP1000 and the French EPR entered into a series of competitive bids in the international market, both winning widespread favor by promoting the technologies’ “advanced” qualities. From this, the two formed a “dynamic duo” that could be seen anywhere a new project emerged.   

 Westinghouse lost its competitive edge, and was left empty-handed. Westinghouse’s positive outlook during this “resurgence” was short-lived; it suffered repeated losses in a series of bids, gaining nothing in the process. It was defeated, for example, [in its bids at] Benele in Bulgaria, Ostrovets in Belarus, and Visaginas in Lithuania. Once the lie, promoted by Westinghouse during the tender process, of the AP1000 being “the most economical option” was exposed, the lack of appropriate verifications subsequently came under scrutiny, and Westinghouse saw a decline in its credibility. Additionally, Westinghouse had no plan [for its customers] to help address treatment and disposal of spent fuel or offer support to raise capital, causing it to be a weak competitor overall. It was therefore not invited to participate in several project tenders and was unable to even secure itself “a seat at the table”. This was exemplified by the bids for Jordan’s QasrAmra and Finland’s Hanhikiri projects. Moreover, Westinghouse failed to secure its own livelihood, even when it was faced with some of the best scenarios possible, namely, in instances in which its buyers had no other choice of suppliers due to political maneuvering; it still experienced project cancellations due to its own internal issues. For example, Temelen in the Czech Republic and Kozloduy 7 in Bulgaria were unable to accept the higher rate of electricity to the end-users that would result from the high cost of the project. It wasn’t economically feasible. Recently the Moorside project in the U.K. has run into some trouble too, so there’s basically no chance of using the AP1000 there. With no international competitiveness, long periods of time with no orders, and no profits, how could Westinghouse remain profitable?  These failures have caused Westinghouse and its partners, one by one, to spiral into decline.

 The American builds have been terminated. America’s new AP1000 NPP builds were subject to delays and burdened with cost overruns, and were forced down the path to termination, incurring heavy economic losses. In the end Westinghouse itself fell into financial crisis, charting its own course into bankruptcy. The aftermath of V.C. Summer’s project termination was painful; Westinghouse laid off 870 workers, including 125 from its headquarters in Monroeville. Another thousand or so subcontractors lost their jobs [too]. In order to protect their interests, the [newly] unemployed workers brought a lawsuit against Westinghouse with the bankruptcy court. On September 25th the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported that law enforcement, at the request of both the South Carolina Judiciary and House of Representatives, has begun a criminal investigation against the two project owners for the 900M USD loss incurred due to the failure of the project.     

Westinghouse’s partners have fallen into crisis, one after the other. Failure to receive new orders also affected Westinghouse’s partners. They too have experienced financial crisis and have fallen like dominos one after another. During the resurgence period, Westinghouse assembled a consortium, including Shaw, CB&I, etc., to promote the AP1000. Shaw became the first domino to encounter financial difficulties. First, it returned its 20% share in Westinghouse to Toshiba in order to survive longer. This strategy did not help them to sustain operations and Shaw ended up being taken over by CB&I, its “brother” in the consortium. Later on, CB&I could not sustain operations itself and sold off its subsidiary, S&W. This time, Westinghouse had to take over the company on its own. This misconduct has led to more than one billion dollars’ worth of losses and has pushed Toshiba, Westinghouse’s parent company, to the edge of bankruptcy. The owner of VC Summer NPP has been summoned for interrogation by the overseeing authorities and faces investigation of criminal liability.

The key lesson learned is that the AP1000’s superlatives publicized by Westinghouse are mostly exaggerations. [People] blindly bought their words, followed each other blindly, and only ended up with infinite suffering.

China introduced AP1000 technologies and is now finishing the technology transfer

 Our country started the process to import AP1000 technologies in 2006. It has been over ten years and the projects (Sanmen and Haiyang) have entered their final stages. Now it’s time to “finish the apprenticeship.” The AP1000 projects have finished most of the construction as well as the subsequent design optimization for additional auxiliary systems. Based on our digestion of the technologies transferred, we have additionally designed a 1400MWe demonstration unit which is now almost ready to start construction as well, as soon as the remaining issues are addressed. Therefore, we have basically mastered the transferred technologies and are going to finish our apprenticeship. Well, the last few steps are the hardest. As the Chinese saying goes “the first ninety miles of a hundred-mile journey is only halfway to the end,” and we still face tough challenges. There are two reasons behind our quick learning of the transferred technologies. On one hand, our intelligent engineers and technicians have striven really hard. On the other hand, the technologies and design provided by Westinghouse were so immature and full of gaps that our engineers had to make up the differences by themselves, which actually gave them the opportunity to better master the technologies. Solving the problems on their own made it easier to understand, absorb, and master the core content of the introduced technologies.

The AP1000 under construction in our country is neither the Revision 15 permitted by the U.S. NRC, nor the later-permitted Revision 19. We developed our own version with some “Chinese characteristics.” After Westinghouse started the bankruptcy protection proceedings, the new CEO Jose Gutierrez announced that the AP1000 model under construction in China would replace the originally-planned Version 19 and become the standard AP1000 model to be promoted by Westinghouse in the future. It appears that the China model has more potential than the original Rev. 15 and 19 and has become Westinghouse’s orthodox “C [China]” model.  Yet it does not change the ownership of the intellectual property rights. The following AP1000, or ‘CAP1000’ units to be built in our country are still the “American AP1000,” and the intellectual property rights have nothing to do with China. In addition, the design itself has some unresolved problems; we have had to purchase some special equipment and materials through Westinghouse. The special equipment and monopolization of certain materials may become Westinghouse’s “grasping tools” and make it easier for them to raise prices for, blackmail, or control [the projects in China]. Despite the fact that we are almost finishing the apprenticeship, wide gaps still exist between our current status and owning a brand with complete intellectual property rights.

The value, assets, and capabilities of Westinghouse

 1.       How much is Westinghouse worth?

In 2000, the valuation was 1.585 billion dollars. BNFL purchased Westinghouse in March 1999 at the price of 1.1 billion dollars and took over ABB-CE for 485 million dollars in December of the same year. The two companies merged into Westinghouse Electric, which was worth 1.585 billion dollars.

In 2006, Toshiba purchased Westinghouse at 5.4 billion dollars. In 2005, BNFL experienced financial strain so it put Westinghouse for auction with a reserve price of 1.8 billion dollars. The Mitsubishi Group bid 1.78 billion dollars [at the beginning]. Meanwhile, China was tendering for Gen III reactor type and nuclear technologies. The fact that China was favoring the AP1000 enabled Westinghouse to speak so high of itself that the bid price was driven up. Mitsubishi tripled its bidding price to 3 billion dollars. In the end, Toshiba anomalously offered 5.4 billion dollars and won. The final price was three times higher than the reserve price and Westinghouse was overvalued.

2.       Westinghouse’s usable assets and shortcomings.

Westinghouse is regarded as the pioneer, or “grandfather,” in the nuclear industry worldwide and used to make enormous contributions [to the industry]. Westinghouse started from the military industry with its core competencies in developing and designing reactor types. At this moment, with the parent company Toshiba wanting to sell Westinghouse in response to its own financial strain, I expect that someone will take over Westinghouse’s reactor type technologies and services, which are valuable and usable assets. Westinghouse also has a number of PWR fuel assembly plants which are still serving Gen II NPPs worldwide. Although the Gen II technology is outdated now, fuel assemblies are still essential to the operation of these Gen II NPPs. Therefore, they are usable assets as well.

However, nuclear engineering and construction, i.e., EPC, project design and project management, is not Westinghouse’s strength. Toshiba decided during its financial crisis that Westinghouse will no longer engage in construction projects and will stay focused on the areas of reactor design and maintenance services. This decision also suited Westinghouse’s historical characteristics. In the past, Westinghouse was mainly responsible for the reactor main body in its military and civil nuclear projects, while other engineering and construction companies were contracted to perform the roles of EPC, engineering design, and project management. Manufacturing responsibility for fabrication of primary equipment in the NPP were transferred to Japan and Korea. Westinghouse now suffers severe devastation from taking on the EPC contracts for the two AP1000 projects in the U.S., which serves to prove [that Westinghouse shouldn’t be in this business]. In terms of comprehensive competitiveness in the market, Westinghouse lacks operational experience in NPPs, capacity to finance its projects, and capability to facilitate fuel supply and spent fuel management. Current [new build] markets in developing countries usually require comprehensive and integrated services for the above areas, which Westinghouse cannot provide. This is one of the main reasons why Westinghouse suffered repeated defeats in international tenders.

3.       Core technologies remain unverified. Application of advanced technologies has to be preapproved and verified. Unverified “advanced technology” is merely a potential safety hazard.

The design of the AP1000 is Westinghouse’s core asset. It has been 17 years since the original design concept was first presented. Rev. 15 and 19 of the AP1000 design obtained their design certificates from the NRC and the AP1000 project in the UK also passed its Generic Design Assessment. The AP1000 won China’s tender for Gen III nuclear technology and initiated the construction of four units at two sites in China. In the U.S., another four units at two sites were also initiated as the AP1000 design Rev. 19 ‘demonstration and verification projects’. The two batches of ‘demonstration and verification’ projects have eight units in total and should have been completed a long time ago according to the original plan. It is now time to see their results. However, because this is a brand new revolutionary technology, the demands for verification and validation of the design were high and there were many items that needed to be verified. With time limitations, the verification work was insufficient and the results were not reliable. As time went on, many ‘inherited’ problems were discovered. In contrast to progressive or evolutionary design, a so-called ‘revolutionary’ design requires some substantive experimental research, including scientific feasibility verification for completely passive safety systems, the probability and mechanism for hydrodynamic failure in the passive residual heat removal system, etc… Due to time constraints, these tasks were not completed. Other potential hidden security risks are also yet to be ruled out, for example verification and validation testing for the canned motor pump and explosion valve. 

4.       It’s time to end our blind faith in Westinghouse

Westinghouse used to be known as the “grandfather” of nuclear technologies and made lots of contributions as a pioneer. But it has not set its feet in field construction for too long and has little modern experience. It has also gotten slow and aged in technology development, and has already lost the glory of the old days. [For example,] Westinghouse’s design for an SMR is just a miniaturized AP model (22.5MWe) and is not innovative enough. The SMR design lost two rounds of tenders held by the U.S. Department of Energy and was defeated by B&W’s Generation mPower and a 5MWe NuScale model.

Westinghouse’s fuel assembly business is declining as well. For example, one of its old fuel assembly plants was taken over by the French company Areva. In another example, both Russia and the U.S. plan to reprocess and recycle plutonium for peaceful uses. The U.S. wanted to build a MOx fuel plant [and opened tendering for the program]. Westinghouse was not qualified to participate the tendering because it did not have the technology. Westinghouse also has a few Gen II light water fuel assembly fabrication facilities with outdated technologies. It got a big contract to sell the Russian-style fuel assemblies to Ukraine with the assistance of the U.S. government’s diplomatic and political leverage. However, two major accidents occurred during the trial period and became a black mark on Westinghouse’s reputation in the international market. It was basically a straight copy of the older Russian technology back from in the 1970s and Westinghouse still messed it up. It further demonstrated Westinghouse’s limited technological capabilities.

Who will take over Westinghouse?

Following the conclusion of Westinghouse’s bankruptcy protection, the next juncture would be restructuring to be sold as a newly integrated corporation and find a new owner. Who will take it over?

1.       Attitude of the U.S. government

President Trump promised to rescue the dying American nuclear industry. A senior U.S. nuclear policy research fellow advocated that “the U.S. government should restore and develop nuclear industry” and proposed many policy recommendations. However, with regard to whether to save the bankrupt Westinghouse or not, the researcher’s opinion was to give it up and said it is both “impossible” and “unnecessary” to save it. A report in another recent article claimed that the U.S. government is seeking a buyer to take over Westinghouse so that it will not fall into Chinese hands. This article focused on the three actions being studied: the U.S. government directly impedes [any potential sale to] China; encourages domestic investors or those from ally countries to take it over; or purchase its stocks directly and holds the shares [as state property].

Westinghouse let the U.S. government down as a diplomatic tool. As a diplomatic and political tool of the U. S. government, it performed poorly and inspired disappointment.

The U.S. government placed sanctions on Russia as a response to its activities in Ukraine. It mandated Westinghouse to provide Ukraine with the Russian-style fuel assemblies as a substitute supplier for Russia so that the strategic connection between Ukraine and Russia could be cut. The movement was a part of the plan to sanction Russia with diplomatic isolation. Westinghouse got this big contract with great support from the U.S. government and the international political environment. Yet two accidents occurred during trial operation using Westinghouse’s copies of the Russian design. The project was slowed down and the Russia-Ukraine connection remained.  

The U.S. government also planned to use the AP1000 to infiltrate the Chinese nuclear market and serve as a portion of its strategy to control the development of China’s nuclear industry, but this has been a complete failure. At the beginning of the introduction of the AP1000, China accepted the exclusive policy called the “leap forward development” and agreed to halt all construction of non-AP1000 units.  [Under this deal] China would hand over its whole nuclear market to Westinghouse and it could control and blackmail China through its patent rights, special key technologies, equipment and materials. Foreign media commentators said that “it creates possibilities for the U.S. government to suppress the development of the China nuclear industry and thus achieve a strategic goal.” But as the project was carried out, it met widespread doubt in Chinese nuclear circles. During construction, issues constantly arose with regard to technology, equipment, delays, overruns, etc. With the collective endeavors of China’s domestic experts, China broke through the constraint to exclusively develop the AP1000. There were two main rounds in the breakthrough: first, the domestically modified Gen II + reactor type realized industrialized/large scale development and made China a leader in the global new build market; second, the launch of the original HPR1000 reactor design of which China owns complete proprietary intellectual property rights. Now it’s time for a third round: finish the technology transfer of AP1000, turn it into a brand with our proprietary intellectual property rights, and get rid of dependence on foreign technologies and foreign control. Therefore, we are able to crush the U.S. attempt to control the China nuclear market through the AP1000 and suppress the development of China’s nuclear industry. This has also caused the U.S. government to be disappointed with Westinghouse.

In one word, the U.S. government is fully aware of the technological capabilities and operational situation of Westinghouse and regards it as what we call “chicken ribs” in China:  be hardly worth eating but not bad enough to throw away. The U.S. government is unwilling to spend the money to save Westinghouse, while being afraid of seeing it falling into Chinese hands. The ideal situation would be finding a submissive new buyer to spend its money, save Westinghouse, and run the company on the U.S. government’s behalf.

As a response to public queries toward the necessity and feasibility of building new NPPs in the U.S., officials have repeatedly claimed that nuclear technology is a diplomatic tool. The four units under construction in China still serve some diplomatic purposes as part of America’s foreign policy toward China, yet their importance has fallen greatly.

2.       Korea's KEPCO

Westinghouse is now on the edge of bankruptcy and who will take it over? The Korean company KEPCO is believed to be a possible candidate. However, according to Financial Times, Korea has eliminated the possibility to purchase Westinghouse shares. It also says that Korea still wants/welcomes foreign technologies yet the country already has its own technology. The takeover has enormous financial risks and very few people are pushing for it [in Korea].

There are also two challenges if Korean Electric Power Corp., (KEPCO), wants to buy Westinghouse. First, how to run the company? It will follow Toshiba’s tragic trajectory if it becomes the new parent company while the executive power remains in the hands of U.S. government, just like Toshiba’s “ghost ownership.” Second, Korea already has its original APR1400 technologies and the Barakah project, a technology export to UAE, has been a success.  The APR1400 has already became a black horse in the international market and there is no need for Korea to also introduce the frequent loser, AP1000. The new Korean president Moon Jae-in has also announced the de-nuclearization policy and has promised to phase out nuclear power gradually in Korea. There will be no more domestic market for APR1400 and so KEPCO is looking for more opportunities in the international market, for instance the U.K. KEPCO is also interested in investing NuGen’s Moorside project, with the requirement being to replace the AP1000 with APR1400.


3.       U.S. non-nuclear private enterprise

It was reported on September 27th that BlackStone, an American private capital group, and Apollo Global may want to acquire WEC.   

Will China save Westinghouse? 

 Pay attention to changes that already occurred. The situation this time that Westinghouse is looking for a new owner is drastically different from the 2005 BNFL tendering.

First, Westinghouse has changed a lot. Last time when BNFL was selling it, Westinghouse had just launched the blueprint of the AP1000 design and obtained permits from NRC, while China was favoring the design which gave it more leverage. This time, however, it is ‘begging’ to sell after Westinghouse was repeatedly defeated in international tendering and had projects terminated due to cost overruns and project delays. It cost the parent company huge losses. Westinghouse is becoming “chicken ribs” quickly and is making itself look really bad.

Second, the previous tendering was well prepared. It was like seeing the daughter getting married off with lots of trousseau. This time, on the contrary, is an emergency response to pay off the debts. It’s a desperate move like selling your children.

Third, China used to favor AP1000 a lot and now has its own doubts. China found out that the technologies transferred are far less advanced than what Westinghouse claimed them to be and now feels like it was fooled.

Fourth, the U.S. government now has lower requirement for a new owner. Last time, the executive power remained inside Westinghouse and didn’t go to Toshiba with the ownership. Now that clause is gone as long as the company stays out of China’s touch.

 Will China bail them [Westinghouse] out?

 In principle, no. We already have our own technology portfolio, including what we’ve imported and there’s nothing we could need there, apart from a small portion of their usable assets that could be sold off (and there aren’t many). Westinghouse’s reputation isn’t what it used to be, so it wouldn’t be much of an asset for us leverage in our export efforts. Besides, we need to liberate our way of thinking…we have passed the point of needing to import tech…we have our own smart technical experts and proprietary IP – it’s time to work on self-improvement.

There are specific scenarios in which we would bail them out, but the following [4] conditions must be met:

First, it couldn’t be under a “dual-citizenship” management framework like what was done with Toshiba; the control would need to be entirely in our hands

Despite the so-called “minimal inference” policy that the US government promised the Japanese, what actually happened is that Toshiba assumed all the financial liability of the company while the planning, strategy and management all lay with the Americans. With poor management, it created huge losses [for Toshiba]. In addition…Westinghouse became like a diplomatic tool for the US government. We need to have actual leadership authority

Second, the price would have to be very low

Westinghouse doesn’t have any leverage to negotiate. And if we caught any whiff of US government interference or another company in the running, we’d pull out immediately. There’s no need to pay big money for spoiled goods.

Third there would need to be an adjustment to the direction of operations.

 We would want to see it focus exclusively on its strengths in reactor R&D, and pull out of the reactor construction business. Their activities would be merged into our comprehensive national nuclear power R&D plan. 

Fourth, there would need to be a complete restructuring

Just like what EDF did with BE in the UK, we would totally restructure after acquisition, take control of the strategy and operations philosophy, turn it into a Chinese research and design institute for nuclear reactors, and do away with the Westinghouse brand-name

4. How the Chinese Nuclear Industry Can Move Forward [Following Westinghouse’s Bankruptcy]

Provided safety can be assured, we will complete construction of the current AP1000 builds.

The V.C. Summer and Vogtle projects [were supposed to be] Westinghouse’s “second echelon of AP1000 test platforms” before meeting a premature end. The Chinese plant construction projects at Sanmen and Haiyang, as the first echelon, have the primary function of proving the overall viability of [AP1000] construction and technology, as well as its economic [viability], and those projects proceeded relatively smoothly compared to the second echelon in America. But, due to issues arising from intrinsic characteristics of the AP1000 design, those projects, as was the case with the American projects, also saw problems with cost overruns, delays, and equipment deficiencies, which added on [an extra] 4 years to the project and nearly doubled the cost of investment. That money will be difficult to make a return on, and the economic survivability of the projects is now a matter of uncertainty. However, China invested painstaking effort and a considerable amount of money into these projects, and should therefore continue [with them], learn [from them], and strive to gain [from them].

However, these projects can only continue under safe conditions. We must do our utmost to avoid [what could be] objectively risky or any “shortcuts” to deadlines, treading safely forward. We [should] only make progress once the remaining technology-related safety issues, or any other hazards have been removed from the equation.

Westinghouse should be held strictly liable and financially responsible for any of the losses incurred due to its unfulfilled contractual obligations.

Firstly, we should conduct a “disassembly inspection” of the canned motor pumps, loading nuclear fuel only once we are sure [the components] are intact. Problems with canned motor pumps are often only discovered during the “disassembly” portion of the testing [phase]. “Changes” [in how the pumps run] have been observed with several pumps that have been in operation for a long [enough] period, giving [us] ample reason to be worried about the [the possibility of other] remaining issues. We should use “disassembly inspections” to verify [the safety of the equipment] and assuage people’s concerns. Conducting these inspections prior to fuel loading is both wise and necessary. Westinghouse, in its role as the supplier, did not provide sufficient reason for refusing [to conduct these inspections in the first place]. Since the cost wouldn’t be that high, this could only be indicative of fear and a guilty conscience [on the part of Westinghouse]. This refusal “vainly” attempted to push the burden of responsibility onto the Chinese leadership [within the industry]. Now that we are waiting on approval to begin fuel loading, [Westinghouse], in theory, would absolutely have the time to complete this task.

Secondly, The AP1000 is not simply a follow-on design to other third generation models, it is a revolutionary design [requiring] substantial research and development; this R&D is [precisely] the prerequisite for moving construction along. The scientific feasibility of the AP1000 passive safety systems should have been verified in the demonstration phase. [An item of such concern], for example, is the study on the hydraulics testing failure rate of the residual heat removal system. Westinghouse already “tested” [this] using Sanmen’s unit 1, and how did that work out? Was that the proper [administrative] channel to go through? Was the problem solved? [I] don’t know why [we] haven’t yet seen a public announcement on the result [of that testing]. [Some] people suspect that the testing was not in keeping with its original intention. The question of the safety concerning AP technology needs [to be answered] with transparency and objectivity.

There are additional remaining problems similar to [what was revealed by] the feasibility testing of the explosion valve, and we should continue to address them.
Based on research digested from importing the AP1000 technology, as well as the significant amount of its own independent R&D, SNERDI has made much progress on the development of the CAP1400. But the problem that the CAP1400 is facing is related to the AP series [as a whole]. Its construction should only be commenced after testing of the primary pump has been successful, and after other AP series issues are addressed [at the base] with the AP1000.

Future Prospects and the Way Forward for the AP Series

Design changes must be made. The AP1000 has suffered a series of attempts and [subsequent] failures in the international market, and [is now] in the midst of bankruptcy following the failures of the two [aforementioned] American builds. The, by contrast, relatively smooth projects in China also experienced delays and cost overruns, with the fundamental problem resting in Westinghouse’s “modus operandi” [that consists of] manipulating competition within the international market, and seeking innovation at the cost of economic [feasibility]. And in the process of “robbing us of progress”, Westinghouse neglected the thorough scientific testing of new technology, and fell into this trap of [having its technology labeled] “expensive, delayed, and subject to cost overruns and safety issues. [Westinghouse’s failure here] has additionally resulted in high [investment] costs and high electricity prices [needed to cover the costs], a loss in its ability to produce carbon-alternative power, a loss in its ability to compete with wind and solar, grief on behalf of the government and the people, and its very means to self-reliance and survivability.

How can China pursue development now that the AP1000 technology has been imported? We must make our own design changes, including major changes to the design scheme, pushing for greater “maturity”, more “Chineseness”, as well as more cost-saving, creating our own brand “with Chinese characteristics”. [These changes] are necessary for the survival of the development of the AP-series technology.

We need greater emphasis on ensuring safety and mature development, achieving each in full.

Advanced technology that has yet to be proven isn’t advanced, it’s a hazard. To address this, we need to conduct ample testing or substitute [the tech] with mature technology that has already been proven. Canned motor pumps and explosion valves [are components that] are potential causes for concern. If it seems the components should be replaced, there is no need to rigidly adhere to the “passive [safety] framework” [of the AP1000 design]. We need to get rid of each of the existing safety hazards.

Completion the upgrade and advancements with Chinese rebranding and improved economics.  We must create a proprietary brand with [Chinese] characteristics. Based on our experience with field construction, we should perfect the model and make it more Sinicized and standardized. We want it to be a reactor type that can be made by ourselves and reflect the true strength of Chinese nuclear industry. The Sinicized model must be suited for China and must be integrated into standardized Chinese systems, for instance, using 50 Hz power supply equipment to replace the 60 Hz ones. We need to erase the traces of America and Westinghouse. We ought to achieve proprietary and localized sophisticated technologies. For those equipment and materials with a monopolistic nature that are harder to buy in international markets, we need to localize them as soon as possible. Canned motor pumps is one instance where foreign companies could use a market monopoly and derivative pricing power and supply capability to blackmail and control China. It is also urgent to solve the IP-related problems.

Lower the costs and making plants cheaper is also necessary to suit the situations of developing countries. It is a primary goal and necessary condition for our original model to survive and develop, and a prerequisite to eventually “go out” into international markets. The French-developed EPR now has a new version design called “EPR-New” that aims for a 25% cost cut (this is still not enough, they’ll need to work harder). On the flipside, no upgrade plan has been mentioned by Westinghouse with regard to the AP1000. We should do it by ourselves. The new model should meet the modern demands for the development of nuclear power.

The new model need to be distinct enough and cut its connections with the old AP design. It should have its own uniqueness as part of an original Chinese [reactor type] system. It is important to cast off the dependence on America’s Westinghouse and its control. I suggest to give it a new name with Chinese characteristics. Since we already have “Hualong” [China Dragon, HPR1000], we can follow this example and name it something like “Xiafeng” [Sino Phoenix], meaning the Chinse nuclear industry will have both dragons and phoenix and will fly high in the international market, very auspicious indeed. 

This positive outlook needs to develop a solid foundation. We need to set our feet on the ground and work really hard. First of all, we need to solve the existing problems of the projects under construction and do a good job on our upgrades of the current reactor designs. The bright future will be nothing but empty talk without sufficiently strong endeavors on our part.

We need to resolutely and consistently promote the development of Hualong One [HPR1000] technology both domestically and abroad.

We need to excel on our domestic and overseas projects

 We need to build Fuqing Unit 5&6 and Karachi Unit 2&3 in good time, breaking through the “normalcy” of schedule delays for FOAK construction. These four units need to be established as outstanding examples of nuclear project construction. We also need to improve our marketing and promotion capabilities.

We need to have the HPR1000 tech verified under the EUR apparatus as well as the GDA in the UK.

CGN has already applied for the British GDA [for the Bradwell B project]. I urge CNNC to apply for safety inspections of related EUR institutions. Once they perform well and pass the assessment with high marks it will be easier to promote our international reputation and accelerate the speed of ‘going out.’

Strengthen further development of the Hualong 1 [HPR1000]. We need to adapt digital and computer-based technologies and further develop the Hualong 1 to make it safer and more economical.

Move toward the direction of having a systemized series. We need to further upgrade [the current reactor types] and make them a systemized series, which strengthen our capabilities to “go out” to meet the diverse and flexible market demands.

The import of the [foreign] AP1000 technology has now morphed into a potential opportunity for China to develop an indigenous 3rd Gen reactor type. Once our technological “metamorphosis” is complete, we can free ourselves of Westinghouse, free ourselves of the shadow of the AP [series], “spread our wings as a phoenix reborn”, and realize a brighter future for ourselves.

 Final Words

The mainstream western technology exemplified by the AP series and the French EPR design have both fallen into the trap of being expensive, both subject to delays, both subject to cost overruns, both fraught with equipment safety hazards, and both leading to bankruptcy for their designers. On the other hand, the Russian VVER1200, the Korean APR1400 and our own Hualong all have a reasonable price, on-time construction, strong orders, and have none of the other problems associated with the mainstream western models.

In the new age of Gen III, we have witnessed a distinct contrast between the mainstream western reactor types and the Chinese, Korean, and Russian ones. The Chinese nuclear industry has been recognized worldwide for our economical and effective construction capabilities. The delicate design of the HPR1000 integrates active and passive designs well and is extremely economically competitive. Although we had an 8-year pause in R&D, we have now caught up very quickly. 6 units are currently under construction, which also demonstrates the future livelihood [of the reactor type]. Phasing out the outdated and embracing the innovative is a natural trend. Survival of the fittest is the secret to thriving. Our country’s nuclear industry development is eliminating dependence [on Western technologies], breaking through external constraints, overtaking the mainstream designs, and stepping into a new age.



Nuclear News Weekly Roundup – 11/06 - 11/10

World’s First HPR1000 Steam Generator Delivered to Fuqing Unit 5

On November 9th, Fuqing Unit 5’s steam generator was delivered, the world’s first for an HPR1000 unit. It was placed beneath the bridge crane and is ready to be installed on the NI’s 16.5 m2 platform.


LOT1, Digital Control System (DCS) Equipment of Karachi Unit 2 Passed Acceptance Inspection

Karachi Unit 2’s DCS equipment, LOT1, has recently passed its acceptance inspection. The purchaser, China Nuclear Industry Zhongyuan Construction Corporation, organized the inspection and assembled a team of more than 30 expert participants from CNPE, Huadong Electric Power Design Institute, and Beijing Starbecs Engineering Management Company, an engineering project supervision subsidiary of CNPE. Inspection items include an acceptance examination of the equipment and quality assurance inspection. The inspection team carefully examined the documents and records produced during the “working stage”, such as those related to the required equipment analysis, engineering design, procurements, manufacturing, and testing, etc. The experts also conducted visual checks on the DCS equipment as well as spare parts, and ran tests to check system functionality. The inspection team verified that the equipment meets contract requirements and complies with all the technical specifications and list of acceptance inspection standards. Following this, the DCS LOT1 equipment for Karachi Unit 2 received shipping approval.


HPR1000 Prototype Generator at Fuqing Unit 5 is Successfully Developed and Produced

On November 6th, the first HPR1000 half-speed turbine generator prototype, which is being used at Fuqing Unit 5, passed in-house prototype testing. Turbine generators are the primary equipment used to turn nuclear energy into electrical power. The half-speed turbine generator was developed and produced by Dongfang Electric. The development of the prototype faces various challenges related to its complex specifications, large size, complicated structure, sophisticated technology, etc. The prototype test includes 27 different tests and observations, including open circuit and short circuit test, as well as temperature increase and vibration observations, etc. Each technical performance test fulfilled contract requirements and technical specifications, and has the overall highest technical performance in the world.


Fuqing Unit 2 Finished Its Second Outage

On November 6th, Fuqing Unit 2 was brought back online after finishing its second outage and refueling period, including all of its related inspection maintenance work, and testing. The second outage of Unit 2, referred to as “Outage 202”, had 6372 inspection and maintenance items completed in 36.2 days. It was Fuqing Unit 2’s first annual short outage.

Nuclear News Weekly Roundup – 10/30 - 11/03

Hongyanhe Unit 5 Reached its First NI Installation Milestone

On October 31st installation of the ring crane at Hongyanhe Unit 5 was completed, marking the first NI installation milestone for the project. The ring crane was installed and is now ready for use 15 days ahead of schedule, setting a solid foundation for installing primary equipment and related components.


NI Plant Civil Construction Drawings for HPR1000 at Fangchenggang Unit 3 Published

On October 31st, the final installment of the NI containment building’s civil construction drawings detailing the HPR1000 build at Fangchengang Unit 3 was published. With this release, CGN has now published all of the civil construction drawings of its Fangchenggang flagship HPR1000 reactor.


Fuqing Unit 3 Enters First Outage/ Refueling

On October 31st, Fuqing Unit 3 finished network islanding and entered “Outage 301”. Outage 301 is the first outage and refueling for Fuqing Unit 3. It will last 69 days and includes 7042 items to be addressed, including refueling the nuclear reactor, hydraulic testing for the primary coolant system, an RPV in-service examination, air-tightness tests for the containment building and penetrations, a full-scope in-service examination for the steam generators and pressurizers, a strip inspection for the turbine’s high and medium pressure cylinder, etc.


First Indigenous Dry Storage Cask Container Prototype Passed Acceptance Check

The first indigenous dry storage cask’s concrete container has recently passed Areva’s acceptance check. The key piece of equipment, the dry storage cask’s stainless steel support rack (DSC support rack hereafter), is manufactured by China Nuclear Industry Huaxing Construction Company, Ltd. Areva’s acceptance indicates that the China Nuclear Huaxing - Areva cooperation project has entered its implementation stage, which lays a foundation for China Nuclear Huaxing to enter the nuclear fuel post-treatment service market. The DSC support rack is installed inside the dry storage cask’s concrete container as the slide rack for filling and discharging DSCs. It is also a structural support for long-term storage and must meet high technical standards like precision and degree of various angles and geometric specifications.

Nicobar Group © 2017